Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Singh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Innovative Sports Management Incorporated v. Ghuman et al
as 2:2022cv02018
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management Incorporated doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Sukhi Singh Ghuman individually doing business as Union Jack, Kevin Currie Johnston individually doing business as Union Jack, Manjinder Singh individually doing business as Union Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Singh v. Garland
as 22-6398
Petitioner:
MANJINDER SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
GREWAL et al v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2022cv01723
Plaintiff:
RAMANJIT KAUR GREWAL and MANJINDER SINGH GREWAL
Defendant:
UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and ALISSA EMMEL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Long v. Singh et al
as 2:2021cv00223
Plaintiff:
Mary Long
Defendant:
Manjinder Singh and Jackpot Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beesla v. Vela
as 2:2021cv01298
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh Beesla
Defendant:
Israel Vela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beesla v. Seigel
as 3:2021cv05699
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh Beesla
Defendant:
Tom Seigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beesla v. Sabha
as 2:2021cv01154
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh Beesla
Defendant:
Gurudwara Singh Sabha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
