Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Ramos v. Almamlouh et al
as 1:2024cv01776
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Ramos
Defendant:
Healthy Way Organic Market LLC, Rafik Salem Almamlouh and Abdul Hamid Alzahere
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jose Ramos-Cruz, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1104
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL RAMOS-CRUZ, BIANA AMERICA GIRON-BARRERA DE RAMOS, A. C. R.-G. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(HC) Ramos v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
as 1:2023cv00922
Petitioner:
Manuel Ramos
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States v. Ramos
as 23-6071
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ISAAC MANUEL RAMOS
RAMOS v. 3M COMAPNY
as 3:2023cv07623
Plaintiff:
MANUEL RAMOS
Defendant:
3M COMAPNY and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05876
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN NORRIS, JOHN RUMPLE, QUASHAWN CYPRESS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Acosta et al v. Tjar Group Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv01416
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Ramos Acosta, Jose Daniel Padilla Alonzo and Erik Josue Ruiz Munguia
Defendant:
Tjar Group Corp. and Wang Lam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Carr v. Tri-National Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jackie Renea Carr
Defendant:
Tri-National Inc and Juan Manuel Ramos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ramos v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv05695
Plaintiff:
Cruz Manuel Ramos and FNU LNU
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
