Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Singanonh v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2018cv01001
Plaintiff:
Tiengkham Singanonh
Defendant:
Rodriguez, Fresno County Jail and Margaret Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singanonh v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2018cv00590
Plaintiff:
Tiengkham Singanonh
Defendant:
Rodriguez, Fresno County Jail and Margaret Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Mims et al
as 1:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
Margaret Mims, L. Kuchkovskaya, Jennifer Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip Bonnette et al vs Dick, et al
as 1:2018cv00046
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bonnette and Linda Faye Grant-Jones
Defendant:
Leland Ross Dick, Michael Herbert Crowley, Ronald James Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Edward Guy v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv01408
Plaintiff:
Patrick Edward Guy
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Margaret Mims, Brian Pacheco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Mims et al
as 1:2017cv01402
Plaintiff:
Gary Dale Poole
Defendant:
Margaret Mims, Stephani Calvio, Obadina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Peruta, et al v. County of San Diego, et al
as 10-56971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, LESLIE BUNCHER, Dr., MICHELLE LAXSON and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION, ROBERT T. DOYLE, Marin County Sheriff and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff
Santos v. Mims
as 1:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Santos, Sr.
Defendant:
Margaret Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Mims
as 1:2016at01055
Petitioner:
Elias Mendoza Perez
Respondent:
Margaret Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez v. Mims
as 1:2016cv01935
Petitioner:
Elias Mendoza Perez
Respondent:
Margaret Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
