Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Darnell Wilson v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner, et al
as 13-60574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES HOLMAN, Warden at Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, MARGARETT BINGHAM, Superintendent at Central Mississippi Correctional Facility and others
Vernon Threadgill v. Robert Moore, et al
as 11-60714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON H THREADGILL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MOORE, Medical Director, KEN KAISER, Medical Staff, TRACY PHILLIPS and others
Hillhouse v. Spann et al
as 3:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Hillhouse
Defendant:
James Spann, Eric Lacey, Margarett Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. E.R.S. Office et al
as 3:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
Tarvio Walker
Defendant:
E.R.S. Office, Doris McDonald, Christy Gutherz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Bingham
as 3:2010cv00855
Plaintiff:
Owen Nelson
Defendant:
Margarett Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Epps et al
as 3:2010cv00518
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wilson
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, James Holman, Margarett Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Bingham et al
as 3:2010cv00409
Plaintiff:
James Brady
Defendant:
Margarett Bingham, Officer Wilson and Officer Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Threadgill v. Moore et al
as 3:2010cv00378
Plaintiff:
Vernon Threadgill
Defendant:
Robert Moore, Ken Kaiser, Tracy Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre v. Berryman - Evans et al
as 3:2010cv00285
Plaintiff:
Loretta Kaye Pierre
Defendant:
Chandra Berryman - Evans, Margarett Bingham and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hebert v. Epps et al
as 3:2010cv00219
Plaintiff:
Patrick Andrew Hebert
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Gloria Perry, Wexford Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
