Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rosales v. Walmart Inc et al
as 1:2023cv02719
Plaintiff:
Maria Rosales
Defendant:
Walmart Inc, Bonnie and Ukaia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosales v. Freeman et al
as 1:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Maria Rosales
Defendant:
Conadius Freeman and Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Watkins Real Estate Group v. Wesley Dunning et al
as 2:2022cv05597
Plaintiff:
Watkins Real Estate Group
Defendant:
Wesley Dunning, Does 1 to 10, inclusive and Maria Rosales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
La Park La Brea A, LLC v. Meredith et al
as 2:2022cv05561
Plaintiff:
La Park La Brea A, LLC
Defendant:
Alicia Meredith, DOES 1 to 10 and Maria Rosales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Andres Herrera v. Alicia Favela Herrera et al
as 2:2021cv09986
Plaintiff:
Andres Herrera, Jr.
Defendant:
Alicia Favela Herrera, Andres Herrera, III, Maria Rosales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Rosales et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Rosa Maria Rosales and Guadalupe S. Esparza
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Lyft Inc and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Stevens v. Yuma, City of et al
as 2:2020cv00487
Defendant:
Samantha Quayle, Unknown Arteaga, Charles Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Winona Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
