Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Blackburn v. Dimon et al
as 1:2022cv07649
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Blackburn
Defendant:
James Dimon, Marianne Lake, Linda Bammann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Michael Francis Depaola v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis Depaola
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, All American Forcloser Service & Sheryle Machada, Peter Link and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lobevero v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2020cv05590
Defendant:
Jennifer Piepszak, Marianne Lake, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lobevero
Mehta v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2020cv05124
Defendant:
Jennifer Piepszak, Marianne Lake, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Kaushal Mehta
Utley v. Beideman et al
as 1:2019cv04798
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Noach Dear, Bruno Codispoti, Esq., The Kings County Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Natasha Utley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Respass et al v. Lake
as 1:2018mc00295
Plaintiff:
Debra Pendarvis Respass and Kevin Donald Respass
Defendant:
Marianne Lake
Cause Of Action: M 94 Other
Sawyer v. Dimon et al
as 2:2018cv11534
Plaintiff:
Shonnon Sawyer
Defendant:
James Dimon , Marianne Lake , JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and others
St. Maarten v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2018cv03190
Plaintiff:
Ceriis St. Maarten
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Jamie Dimon and Marianne Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
