Cases 21 - 30 of 139
Lallande v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Lallande, IV
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Unknown Croppack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv01166
Plaintiff:
Kedrick D Russell
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Jack Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00444
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, E Wick, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron W Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00315
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Jessie Spurgin, Unknown Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Benny Charles Brooks, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shadid v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Parties, Unknown Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Philip Shadid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knudsen v. Penzone et al
as 2:2020cv02440
Plaintiff:
Brett Aaron Knudsen
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Penzone et al
as 2:2020cv02115
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Phillip Grant, Unknown Vale and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Leonard Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blomdahl #340267 v. Jones et al
as 2:2020cv01207
Defendant:
Unknown Fisk, D Martin, Unknown Randozza and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Paul Blomdahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Uptain v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona et al
as 2:2020cv01092
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Doug Ducey, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Uptain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uptain v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona et al
as 2:2020cv00951
Defendant:
NBC News, Google, CBS News and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Uptain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
