Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Alvarado v. United States of America et al
as 4:2014cv02066
Plaintiff:
Mario Alvarado
Defendant:
United States of America, M Jarmon, R Husted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Pappas v. Countrywide Financial Corp et al
as 2:2007cv05295
Defendant:
Martin R. Melone, Edwin Heller, Countrywide Home Loans Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Dr Marshall J Orloff Ira RO FCC as Custodian AllianceBernstein US Focs Blnd, Patrick J Simpson and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Grant Thornton LLP, KPMG LLP, Countrywide Securities Corporation and others
Not Classified By Court:
Byron B Matthews, Jr, SRM Global Limited Fund Partnership, Independent Fiduciary Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado, Shelley B. Katzeff, Barry Brahn and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Thomas P DiNapoli and Marsha Steele
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Robert L Garber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2002md01486
Plaintiff:
Oracle America, Inc., Petro Computer Systems, Inc., Ashley Pritchett and others
Intervenor:
Maurice Shelly, Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court:
norman d palmer, Norman D. Palmer, Bryan Marcus and others
Defendant:
Korea Development Bank, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co., Ltd., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Unisys Corporation, JACO Electronics, Inc, All American Semiconductor Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified:
Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System, Chemical Valley Pension Fund of West Virginia, Kimball Electronics Tampa, Inc. FKA Reptron Electronics, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Celestica Corporation
Special Master:
Charles B. Renfrew
Claimant:
Oak Point Partners, Inc.
Respondent:
Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
