Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Bradley Steiger v. Luther Strange, III, et al
as 17-14535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY JOSEPH STEIGER
Defendant - Appellee:
LUTHER J. STRANGE, III, State Attorney General, in his Individual and official capacity, MARY BECKER WINDOM, Chief Appellate Judge, in her individual and official capacity, MARK BRUTON, ADOC Records Director, in his individual and official capacity and others
Willie Williams v. Alabama Department of Correcti, et al
as 17-10677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CAROLYN GOLSON, Director, Classificatoin, MARK BRUTON, Classification and others
Steiger v. Strange et al (INMATE 2)

as 2:2016cv00893
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Defendant:
Luther Strange, Edward McFerrin, Terri Bozeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bearry v. Bruton (INMATE 2)

as 2:2016cv00605
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lindsey Bearry
Defendant:
Mark Bruton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Bruton (INMATE 1)

as 2:2016cv00559
Plaintiff:
Michael Ward
Defendant:
Mark Bruton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)

as 2:2015cv00693
Plaintiff:
Joe Ranger Pickett
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Mark Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Bruton, et al. (INMATE 2)

as 2:2014cv01130
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Carnell Thompson
Defendant:
Mark Bruton and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Bruton et al (INMATE 1)

as 2:2014cv01101
Plaintiff:
Kareem Young
Defendant:
Mark Bruton and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Bruton et al (INMATE 1)

as 2:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Kareem Young
Defendant:
Mark Bruton, Angie Baggett, Kathy Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Moulton et al (INMATE 1)

as 3:2013cv00766
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Kevin Moulton, Michael Conaway, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.