Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pendarvis v. Wilson et al
as 2:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
John Trenton Pendarvis
Defendant:
Alan M. Wilson, Mark A. Keel, Hugh E. Weathers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Adams v. Lexington, County of et al
as 8:2020cv04296
Defendant:
Doe No. 1, Mark A. Keel, Lisa Comer and others
Plaintiff:
Alton Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Keel et al
as 8:2019cv03043
Plaintiff:
David Richard Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Executive Director Beverly M Buchcemi, Chief Mark A Keel and Director Bryan P Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Addision v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division et al
as 8:2019cv01847
Defendant:
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and Mark A Keel
Plaintiff:
Jerome Addision and Jerome Addison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Firriolo v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division et al
as 3:2017cv03319
Plaintiff:
Thomas Raymond Firriolo
Defendant:
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Elizabeth Corley, Mark A. Keel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Curry v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Div, The et al
as 1:2014cv04032
Plaintiff:
James Bernard Curry
Defendant:
South Carolina Law Enforcement Div, The, Mark A Keel and John T Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeling v. Tek-Cast, Inc.
as 2:2012cv14089
Plaintiff:
Mark W Keeling
Defendant:
Tek-Cast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Newton v. South Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 6:2010cv01781
Plaintiff:
Bradley C Newton
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Public Safety and Mark A Keel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Keel et al
as 6:2009cv02411
Plaintiff:
Jackie Logan
Defendant:
Mark A Keel and Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
