Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mark Fochtman, et al v. DARP, Inc.
as 20-2068
Defendant:
John Does 1-29 and Hendren Plastics, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Michael Spears, individually and on behalf of all others, Corby Shumate, individually, and on behalf of all others, Sloan Simms, individually and on behalf of all others and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DARP, Inc.
Mark Fochtman, et al v. Hendren Plastics, Inc.
as 20-2061
Defendant:
John Does 1-29 and DARP, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Michael Spears, individually and on behalf of all others, Corby Shumate, individually, and on behalf of all others, Sloan Simms, individually and on behalf of all others and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Hendren Plastics, Inc.
Mark Fochtman, et al v. DARP, Inc., et al
as 19-8005
Respondent:
Andrew Daniel, individually and on behalf of all others, Mark Fochtman, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Michael Spears and others
Other:
Corby Shumate, individually, and on behalf of all others, Hendren Plastics, Inc. and John Does 1-29
Petitioner:
DARP, Inc.
Mark Fochtman, et al v. DARP, Inc.
as 19-8004
Other:
DARP, Inc., Corby Shumate, individually, and on behalf of all others and John Does 1-29
Respondent:
Andrew Daniel, individually and on behalf of all others, Mark Fochtman, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Michael Spears and others
Petitioner:
Hendren Plastics, Inc.
Fochtman et al v. DARP, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv05047
Plaintiff:
Mark Fochtman , Corby Shumate , Michael Spears and others
Defendant:
DARP, Inc. , Hendren Plastics, Inc. and John Does 1-29
Movant:
Daugherty & Daugherty Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 caf
Fochtman et al v. Simmons Foods, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv05228
Plaintiff:
Mark Fochtman and Shane O'Neal
Defendant:
Caair, Inc. , Simmons Foods, Inc. , Darp, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
