Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Riddle #811130 v. Green et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Trequan Riddle #811130
Defendant:
Garret Green, Amy Robare, Mark Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milton et al v. Patterson et al
as 4:2021cv08545
Plaintiff:
William Milton, Shelton Adams, Robert Blackwell and others
Petitioner:
William Pardue
Defendant:
Ronald R. Patterson, State of California, Craig Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolton #776445 v. Horrocks et al
as 2:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bolton #776445
Defendant:
Unknown Horrocks, Mark Hares, Daniel Holdwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Disilvestro, et al.
as 1:2021cv00251
Defendant:
Mentino Disilvestro, Kahn, Mark Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. SCI-Mahanoy et al
as 1:2021cv00378
Defendant:
SCI-Mahanoy and E-Block Unit Team
Plaintiff:
Mark Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Polis et al
as 1:2020cv02999
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Williams and Dean Williams
Plaintiff:
Mark Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumsden v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al Division.
as 9:2019cv00036
Respondent:
Mark Harris
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lumsden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumsden v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2018cv04470
Defendant:
Ronald Givens, Mark Harris, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lumsden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kelley
as 5:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
Mark Harris
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. WARDEN OF SCI-DALLAS et al
as 2:2015cv00192
Petitioner:
THOMAS MARK HARRIS
Respondent:
WARDEN OF SCI-DALLAS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
