Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Stephen McDaniel v. Warden
as 23-10148
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN MARK MCDANIEL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN
MCDANIEL v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00198
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MARK MCDANIEL
Respondent:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RANKIN v. STOKES et al
as 1:2021cv00613
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J.L. RANKIN
Defendant:
JERRY STOKES, DAVID WHISENANT, SALISBURY POST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re the Matter of the Estate of Calvin Cooldige McDaniel
as 2:2019cv08587
Not Yet Classified:
Benjamin S Carson Sr.
In Re:
In re the Matter of the Estate of Calvin Cooldige McDaniel
Petitioner:
Mark McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Craig Mrazek v. Walter Nicholson, et al
as 19-1932
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK MCDANIELS, Correctional Officer, CARLA GREBY, Doctor, NICHOLAS CONKLIN, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG MRAZEK
McDaniel v. Educational Credit Management Corporation
as 3:2018cv01949
Plaintiff:
Mark McDaniel
Defendant:
Educational Credit Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Smith v. E&S Contracting Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Elton Smith
Defendant:
E&S Contracting Inc , Coastal Drilling East LLC and Mark McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Craig Mrazek v. Vicki Herman, et al
as 16-4167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG MRAZEK
Defendant - Appellee:
VICKI HERMAN, Teacher, WALTER NICHOLSON, Warden, CARLA GREBY, Doctor, Medical Director and others
McDaniel et al v. UT Medical Group, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02895
Plaintiff:
Charles Mark McDaniel and Melody McDaniel
Defendant:
UT Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mross v. E&S Contracting Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jerry Mross
Defendant:
E&S Contracting Inc , Shaft Drillers International LLC , Mark McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
