Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Kroll et al v. 440 West 164th Street, HDFC et al
as 7:2015cv03938
Plaintiff:
Lothar Kroll , Andreas Kroll , Inna Khiterer and others
Defendant:
440 West 164th Street, HDFC, FIA 164th St. Holdings LLC, SAC 4902071714, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gair v. Isis Parenting
as 1:2014cv13657
Plaintiff:
Nancy Gair
Defendant:
Isis Parenting, Inc., Peter Delahunt, Mark Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Lewis et al v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. (TV3)
as 3:2013cv00675
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. , Pete E Almeida, American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lewis, Lorraine Lewis, Richard L Lewis, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mark Schwartz v. USA
as 12-17133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK SCHWARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Schwartz v. United States Of America
as 3:2012cv00586
Plaintiff:
Mark Schwartz
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Schwartz v. United States Of America
as 4:2012cv00586
Plaintiff:
Mark Schwartz
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Schwartz et al v. Unity Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2011cv11093
Plaintiff:
Mark Schwartz and Mar-Rog Specialties, Inc.
Defendant:
Unity Manufacturing Company and Novita Technologies
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lawtis Rhoden v. Stephen Mayberg, et al
as 09-15420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWTIS DONALD RHODEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN W. MAYBERG, Director of The Calfornia Dept. of Mental Health, BRENDA EPPERLY-ELLIS, DAWN RENEE STARR and others
Schwartz et al v. Tricam Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02158
Plaintiff:
Mark Schwartz and Susan Schwartz
Defendant:
Tricam Industries, Inc. and RMM Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
