Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jones v. Clark
as 8:2016cv00347
Defendant:
Deborah Clark
Plaintiff:
Marlin E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Glen Haven Home et al
as 1:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Marlin E Jones
Defendant:
Glen Haven Home, Trevor Blesh and Deborah Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Glen Haven Home et al
as 8:2016cv00097
Defendant:
Trevor Blesh and Glen Haven Home
Plaintiff:
Marlin E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Glen Haven Home et al
as 8:2015cv00432
Defendant:
Deborah Clark and Glen Haven Home
Plaintiff:
Marlin E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jones v. City of North Platte et al
as 8:2011cv00130
Defendant:
Jim Ady, City of North Platte, Monte McNeil and others
Plaintiff:
Marlin E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marlin Jones v. Legal Aid of Nebraska, et al
as 11-1458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marlin E. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Legal Aid of Nebraska, David M. Pantos, Executive Director of Legal Aid of Nebraska and Jennifer Gaughan, Director of Litigation for Legal Aid of Nebraska
Marlin Jones v. City of North Platte, et al
as 10-2236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marlin E. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
City of North Platte, Martin Gutschenritter, Chief of Police, Kendall Allison, Police Officer and others
Jones v. Legal Aid of Nebraska et al
as 7:2010cv05008
Defendant:
Jennifer Gaughan, Legal Aid of Nebraska and David M. Pantos
Plaintiff:
Marlin E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marlin Jones v. HUD, et al
as 10-2051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marlin E. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Department of Housing and Urban Development, John Does and Clyde B. Blandford, Executive Director of HUD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
