Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Krinsky v. Marriott Worldwide Reservation Services, LLC
as 1:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Laura Krinsky
Defendant:
Marriott Worldwide Reservation Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02329
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.,
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc. , American Beacon Advisors, Inc., , Fedex Corporation and others
Counter_claimant:
Marriott International Inc., Marriott Worldwide Reservation Services, LLC., National Railroad Passenger Corporation and others
Counter_defendant:
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.
Movant:
Target Corporation , Target Bank and Target National Bank
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. American Airlines Inc
as 2:2007cv02196
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Defendant:
American Airlines Inc, American Airlines Inc, American Airlines Inc and others
Counter Claimant:
Marriott International Inc, Marriott International Inc, Marriott International Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Special Master:
Bernard H Chao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
