Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Barron v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
as 5:2025cv00094
Plaintiff:
Raul Barron
Defendant:
Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richards v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director et al
as 5:2025cv00075
Plaintiff:
James Richards
Defendant:
Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director and Management & Training Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richards v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
as 5:2025cv00052
Petitioner:
James Richards
Respondent:
Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welsh v. McLane
as 4:2025cv01073
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Respondent:
Marsha McLane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. McLane et al
as 1:2025cv00337
Plaintiff:
Andre Johnson
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Management Training and Corporation and David Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
San Miguel v. Searcy et al
as 5:2025cv00033
Plaintiff:
Samuel San Miguel
Defendant:
Michael Searcy, Marsha McLane, Kara Gougler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
San Miguel et al v. Searcy et al
as 1:2025cv00039
Defendant:
Management Training Corp., Kara Gougler, Jessica Marsh and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo May and Samuel San Miguel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Bowers et al
as 5:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Delbert G. Rogers
Defendant:
Marsha McLane and David Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. McLane et al
as 5:2024cv00248
Defendant:
Marsha McLane and Management and Training Corporation
Plaintiff:
John Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welsh v. McLane
as 1:2024cv01353
Respondent:
Marsha McLane
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
