Cases 1 - 10 of 8,618
Marshall v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Clifford Marshall
Defendant:
Tyrell Davis, Danny Roe, Sgt. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sappington v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
William C. Sappington
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service, Memphis TN and Benton County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ketzbeau v. Ivy et al
as 4:2024cv11006
Plaintiff:
Jesse I Ketzbeau
Defendant:
Curtis Ivy, Jr., Frances K. Behm, Nancy Abraham and others
Love v. Flowers et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Defendant:
Brandon S. Flowers A.U.S.A., F.C.I Hazelton Warden Rey, F.C.I. Hazelton S.I.S. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marshall v. Vaughn et al
as 9:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
James D. Marshall
Defendant:
Officer Vaughn, Parole Officer Kevin Harmer, Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall #732012 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eunice Marshall #732012
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Lettieri v. Federal Marshals
as 24-5088
Plaintiff:
David Carmine Lettieri
Defendant:
Federal Marshals
Hagan v. U.S. Marshal
as 1:2024cv02897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hagan
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
