Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Debra Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland et al
as 4:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
Deb Haaland and Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Moore et al
as 4:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Maricopa Audubon Society
Defendant:
Randy Moore, Tom Vilsack, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Grand Canyon Wolf Recovery Project et al v. Haaland et al
as 4:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Grand Canyon Wolf Recovery Project, New Mexico Wilderness Association, Wildlands Network and others
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Moore et al
as 4:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Maricopa Audubon Society and Mount Graham Coalition
Defendant:
Randy Moore, Tom Vilsack, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
