Cases 1 - 10 of 11
EAVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv59179
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN EAVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin Williams v. Warden, et al
as 16-15643
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and MARTIN EAVES
Franklin Williams v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 16-14070
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE, R. E. CURRIE, D.A. and MARTIN EAVES
Franklin Williams v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 16-10958
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE, R. E. CURRIE, D.A. and MARTIN EAVES
Franklin Williams v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 16-10574
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA, R. E. CURRIE, D.A. and MARTIN EAVES
Williams v. The Attorney General of the State et al
as 5:2015cv00027
Petitioner:
Franklin L. Williams
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State, R.E. Currie and Martin Eaves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin Williams v. Warden, et al
as 13-10690
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and MARTIN EAVES
Williams v. Tamez et al
as 5:2011cv00083
Petitioner:
Franklin L Williams
Respondent:
Rebecca Tamez and Martin Eaves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Lockheed Martin Eaves Dropping Satellite et al
as 2:2011cv02029
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Eaves Dropping Satellite, Congress Lax Overnight Law, Steve Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Eaves et al
as 5:2010cv00116
Plaintiff:
Morgan Smith
Defendant:
Martin Eaves, Ware County Circuit Defender's Office and J. Clayton Culp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
