Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Christiano v. Eagle Materials et al
as 2:2014cv00822
Plaintiff:
William Christiano
Defendant:
Clay & Bailey Mfg., Co., Eagle Materials, Genuine Parts Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Christiano v. Eagle Materials et al
as 3:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
William Christiano
Defendant:
Clay & Bailey Mfg., Co., Eagle Materials, Genuine Parts Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jones et al v. Martin Sprocket & Gear, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Latoya Jones , Olivia M. Scott and Tammy Jordan
Defendant:
Martin Sprocket & Gear, Inc. and John Does I through X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Martin Sprocket & Gear, Inc., v. Durrette
as 1:2007cv01194
Plaintiff:
Martin Sprocket & Gear, Inc., and Martin Sprocket & Gear, Inc.,
Defendant:
James W. Durrette
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
