Cases 1 - 10 of 22
POLK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91668
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARVIN POLK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lesley Eugene Warren v. Marvin Polk
as 17-4
Petitioner - Appellant:
LESLEY EUGENE WARREN
Respondent - Appellee:
MARVIN POLK, Warden
Adrian Watkins v. Boyd Bennett
as 11-6117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN DOMINIC WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOYD BENNETT, BETTY BROWN, BECKY POPE and others
Watkins v. Bennett et al
as 5:2009ct03127
Plaintiff:
Adrian Dominic Watkins
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Betty Brown, Becky Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus Cotten v. Marvin Polk
as 08-6325
Petitioner - Appellant:
TITUS MIL-QUIGLESS COTTEN
Respondent - Appellee:
MARVIN POLK, Warden of Central Prison
Tolbert v. Duda et al
as 5:2007ct03088
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Tolbert
Defendant:
Sergeant Duda, Sgt. Griffin, Clay Bonde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Polk et al
as 5:2007ct03084
Plaintiff:
Jack Smith
Defendant:
Marvin Polk and R.D. Wellman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golphin v. Branker
as 07-8
Petitioner - Appellant:
TILMON C. GOLPHIN
Respondent - Appellee:
MARVIN POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina and GERALD J. BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Simmons v. Thompson et al
as 5:2007ct03071
Plaintiff:
Charlie Simmons
Defendant:
Nurse Thompson, Joseph Lightsey, Obe Umeci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Larry v. Gerald Branker
as 07-7
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS MICHAEL LARRY
Respondent - Appellee:
MARVIN POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina and GERALD J. BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Amicus Supporting Appellant:
NORTH CAROLINA ACADEMY OF TRIAL LAWYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
