Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Henry SmithIn re: Henry Smith
as 24-10456
Petitioner: In re: HENRY CLAY SMITH
Respondent: MARY B. WINDOM, JENNIFER M. HOWELL, DONALD MCMILLIAN and others
Smith v. Windom et al
as 5:2023cv01733
Plaintiff: Henry Clay Smith, .
Defendant: Honorable Judge Mary B Windom and Jennifer M Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Henry Smith
as 23-13920
Petitioner: In re: HENRY CLAY SMITH
Respondent: DONALD MCMILLIAN, MARY B. WINDOM and STATE OF ALABAMA
Subel v. Ganey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00367
Plaintiff: Carlos Jack Subel
Defendant: Brenda Q. Ganey, Jody W. Bishop, Kristi Deason Hagood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Smith v. Donald McMillian, et al
as 21-13878
Plaintiff / Appellant: HENRY CLAY SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: JUDGE, DONALD MCMILLIAN, Judge and MARY B. WINDOM, Judge
Smith v. McMillian et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00383
Plaintiff: Henry Clay Smith
Defendant: Donald McMillian and Mary B. Windom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Owens v. Mary Windom, et al
as 21-10139
Defendant / Appellee: SUSAN ODOM, Walker County Circuit Court Clerk, TOM PARKER, Alabama Supreme Court, CHRIS SHERER, Walker County Circuit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAYMOND PAUL OWENS
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00557
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Windom et al
as 5:2020cv01043
Defendant: Susan Odom, Honorable Judge Mary B Windom, Honorable Judge Chris Sherer and others
Plaintiff: Raymond Paul Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00162
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?