Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Moody v. McDonough
as 24-450
Plaintiff:
MARY MOODY
Defendant:
DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, United States Secretary of Veterans Affairs, a Cabinet Member and Chief Executive of the Veterans Affairs, a Federal Agency
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
CREAMER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv01874
Plaintiff:
Karen Creamer, Jane Dalen, Mary Moody and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Mayor MURIEL BOWSER, DC HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grosser et al v. Spokane County et al
as 2:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Estate of Benjamin Grosser and Makayla Marie Moody
Defendant:
Spokane County Washington, a municipal corporation doing business as Spokane County Sheriff's Office, Ozzie Knezovich and James Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Michigan, State of et al v. Moody
as 2:2020cv10569
Defendant:
Lisa Marie Moody
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of, Kym Worthy, Frank Murphy Hall of Justice (Wayne County Circuit Court) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Moody et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14781
Plaintiff:
Marie Moody and David Moody
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Birchfield c. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Mary Moody Birchfield
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Moodie v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 2:2014cv14077
Plaintiff:
Mary Moodie
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families and One Hope Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
