Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Matheson v. Farris et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert Chase Matheson
Defendant:
Eddie Farris and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
Ricky Flamingo Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Warden Martin Frink, Amber Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
General Metals Powder Company, LLC v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00711
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The General Metals Powder Company, LLC and General Metals Powder CO., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. The Matheson Tri-Gas Medical Plan
as 3:2019cv00081
Defendant:
The Matheson Tri-Gas Medical Plan and Kory J Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. v. Moellendick et al
as 2:2019cv00369
Plaintiff:
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
Defendant:
Tri-State Oxygen of West Virginia, Inc. and Richard L. moellendick, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dayton Building & Construction Trades Council et al v. School District of the City of Dayton, Ohio
as 3:2015cv00437
Plaintiff:
Dayton Building & Construction Trades Council , Richard Matheson and Thomas E Orendorf, Jr.
Defendant:
Board of Education of the School District of the City of Dayton, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Matheson et al v. Sodexho, Inc
as 3:2013cv00542
Plaintiff:
Kathy Matheson and David Matheson
Defendant:
Sodexho, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Michael Bennett v. Marina Matheson
as 10-5788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
MARINA MATHESON
Bennett v. Matheson
as 3:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Michael C Bennett
Defendant:
Marina Matheson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
