Cases 1 - 10 of 172
James Yant v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 25-1328
Plaintiff:
JAMES N. YANT
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, named as Heidi Washington, individual and official capacity, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager for Director's Office, individual and official capacity, BRYAN MORRISON, Warden, individual and official capacity and others
Ronnie Thomas v. Matt Macauley
as 25-1306
Petitioner:
RONNIE DANTE THOMAS
Respondent:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden
Quincy Williams v. Matt Macauley
as 25-1247
Petitioner:
QUINCY D. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden
Ladon Moore v. Mark Kamradt, et al
as 25-1212
Plaintiff:
LADON MOORE
Defendant:
MARK KAMRADT, Storekeepers, official and personal capacity, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named IBC Transportation Correctional Officers working on August 29, 2023, official and personal capacities, N. BROOKE, Grievance Coordinator, official and personal capacity and others
Dequan Kemp v. Matt Macauley
as 25-1204
Petitioner:
DEQUAN ALAN KEMP
Respondent:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden
Rodgers #981186 v. MaCauley
as 1:2025cv00207
Petitioner:
Lamont James Rodgers #981186, Jr.
Respondent:
Matt MaCauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spearman #536733 v. MaCauley
as 1:2025cv00083
Petitioner:
Undra Will Spearman #536733
Respondent:
Matt MaCauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mims #285091 v. Burch et al
as 1:2025cv00046
Defendant:
B. Hadden, Unknown Burch, C. Battle and others
Plaintiff:
Antwan Tamon Mims #285091
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley #318348 v. Macauley
as 1:2025cv00021
Respondent:
Matt Macauley
Petitioner:
Anthony Michael Ashley #318348
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodgers v. MaCauley
as 2:2024cv13368
Respondent:
Matt MaCauley
Petitioner:
Lamont J. Rodgers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
