Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Matthew Catanzaro v. S. Harry, et al
as 13-1540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATANZARO
Defendant - Appellee:
SHIRLEE HARRY, Warden, named as S. Harry, Warden, STEPHEN DEBOER, Parole Board Member, PAUL CONDINO, Parole Board Member and others
Matthew Catanzaro v. Robert Carr, et al
as 12-1951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATANZARO
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT CARR, Psychologist, ANDREA TOBIAS, Psychologist, ROSANA SOUZA, Psychologist and others
Matthew Catanzaro v. Shirlee Harry
as 12-1119
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATANZARO
Respondent - Appellee:
SHIRLEE HARRY, Warden
Matthew Catanzaro v. Dan Quigley
as 11-2406
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATANZARO
Respondent - Appellee:
DAN QUIGLEY, Warden
Catanzaro #313263 v. Harry et al
as 1:2011cv00867
Petitioner:
Matthew Catanzaro #313263
Respondent:
Shirlee Harry, Stephen DeBoer, Paul Condino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Catanzaro #313263 v. Harry et al
as 1:2011cv00868
Plaintiff:
Matthew Catanzaro #313263
Defendant:
S. Harry, Stephen DeBoer, Paul Condino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Catanzaro v. Carr et al
as 4:2010cv14554
Plaintiff:
Matthew Catanzaro
Defendant:
Carr , Tobias, Souza and others
Catanzaro v. Carr et al
as 2:2010cv14554
Plaintiff:
Matthew Catanzaro
Defendant:
Carr , Tobias, Souza and others
Matthew Catanzaro v. MDOC, et al
as 10-1815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATANZARO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA A. CARUSO, Michigan Department of Corrections Director, GARY BALL, Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Catanzaro #313263 v. Quigley et al
as 2:2010cv00028
Petitioner:
Matthew Catanzaro #313263
Respondent:
Dan Quigley, Unknown Sampson, Unknown Atterbury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
