Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Garrett Kajmowicz v. Matthew Whitaker, et al
as 21-2434
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRETT KAJMOWICZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, in his official capacity as former Acting Attorney General United States of America;, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, an agency of the Department of Justice;, DIRECTOR BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12806
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KAJMOWICZ v. WHITAKER et al
as 2:2019cv00187
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER and others
Plaintiff:
GARRETT KAJMOWICZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05060
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05059
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01048
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gleason v. Whitaker et al
as 4:2019cv00256
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gleason
Defendant:
Thomas E. Brandon and Matthew G. Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAWIDOWICZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2019cv00510
Plaintiff:
STANLEY DAWIDOWICZ
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER and others
Petitioner:
REBECCA S. PIERSON, ROBIN RAE KELLY, JACQUELINE A. SCHNEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00045
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00097
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
