Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Peter Deng v. Matthew G. Whitaker
as 19-1095
Petitioner: Peter Garang Deng
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Abdirizak Salad v. Matthew G. Whitaker
as 19-1089
Respondent: Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner: Abdirizak Osman Salad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv03302
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv03261
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv03260
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv03254
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Johnson v. Matthew Whitaker, et al
as 12-3100
Plaintiff - Appellant: John David Johnson
Defendant - Appellee: Matthew G. Whitaker, U.S. Attorney, Stephen H. Locher, Asst. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Marshal Service
Johnson v. Whitaker et al
as 4:2012cv00094
Plaintiff: John David Johnson
Defendant: Matthew G. Whitaker , Stephen H Locher and U S Marshal's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. United States of America et al
as 4:2009cv00451
Plaintiff: Stephen Gill
Defendant: United States of America, Matthew G. Whitaker, Kelly Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. United States of America et al
as 4:2009cv00450
Plaintiff: Barbara Anne Riley
Defendant: United States of America, Matthew G. Whitaker, Kelly Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?