Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson v. Sasnett et al
as 5:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
Jamie Sasnett and JOHN DOE, 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brundage v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01670
Plaintiff:
Gary Earl Brundage
Defendant:
Matthew Johnson, Darren Cox and Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clarke et al v. Duke et al
as 3:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Rossana Clarke, Jessica Wollaston and Paula Kennedy
Defendant:
Deputy Jacob Duke, Lieutenant Taylor Miller, Trooper Matthew Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DUGAN et al v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
SHEILA DUGAN and MATTHEW JOHNSON
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, LAQUANDRA NESBITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv00430
Plaintiff:
Matthew Daniel Johnson and Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cota v. Malone et al
as 3:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
Michael Cota
Defendant:
John Malone, Thomas M. Gregory, Douglas County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00202
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv01270
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
B Johnson and T Defauw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2020cv06750
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR JUDITH M. PERSICHILLI, GURBIR S GREWAL and PHILIP D. MURPHY
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
