Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Thomas v. USA
as 3:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
Matthew Lloyd Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Berger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv01295
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lloyd Berger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
LLOYD LAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61769
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LLOYD LAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv00293
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lloyd Berger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11978
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Federal Trade Commission v. MOBE Ltd. et al
as 6:2018cv00862
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
MOBE Ltd., MOBEProcessing.com, Inc., Transaction Management USA, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Mark J. Bernet
Intervenor:
Qualpay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Redmond Howard v. Daryl McCready
as 18-1016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REDMOND HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
DARYL MCCREADY, Senior Pastor at Sonrise Church (Berlin), BRYAN MATTHEW LLOYD, Pastor at Salisbury, MD Sonrise Church, MARK AARON THOMAS, Pastor at Princess Anne, MD Sonrise Church and others
Howard v. McCready et al
as 1:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
Redmond Howard
Defendant:
Daryl McCready, Bryan Matthew Lloyd and Mark Aaron Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
