Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Hogan, Philip v. Olsen, Wayne et al
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Philip C. Hogan
Defendant:
Wayne Olsen, Mr. J. Aubihl, C.O. Matthew Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv16657
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KLAPP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13162
Plaintiff:
ADAM KLAPP, CHARLES KINNARD, DARRIUS PEARSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Mitchell v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mitchell
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. City of Garland et al
as 3:2022cv02351
Plaintiff:
Ms. Xochitl Sanchez and Xochitl Sanchez
Defendant:
City of Garland, Lt Matthew Mitchell, Matthew Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv04563
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mitchell
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41609
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv02172
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MITCHELL
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21024
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
