Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Daniel Verduzco v. Mickey Price, et al
as 23-15127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL VERDUZCO
Defendant / Appellee:
MICKEY PRICE, Chief Mental Health Psychologist, R. LIMON, Chief Psychologist, HANNAH E. BUSH and others
Latwahn McElroy v. Maureen McLean, et al
as 20-16586
Defendant / Appellee:
MAUREEN MCLEAN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, M. SAYRE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Latwahn McElroy v. USDC-CAOAK
as 20-72378
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LATWAHN MCELROY, M. SAYRE, MAUREEN MCLEAN and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Petitioner:
LATWAHN MCELROY
McElroy v. McLean et al
as 4:2020cv01900
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, J. Bal, Maureen McLean and others
Plaintiff:
Latwahn J. McElroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James McCurdy v. B. Deal, et al
as 19-17108
Defendant:
MICHAEL FELDER, BICK, M.D., J. CLARK KELSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
B. DEAL, M.D.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CLAYTON MCCURDY
Benjamin Toscano v. Nancy Adam, et al
as 19-16288
Defendant:
CONALL MCCABE, R. L. STRAWN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
P. LENOIR and NANCY ADAM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN K. TOSCANO
Veruzco v. Price
as 4:2019cv01440
Plaintiff:
Daniel Veruzco
Defendant:
Mickey Price, Peter Sayer, J. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Chaparro v. Nnenna Ikegbu, et al
as 19-15012
Defendant / Appellee:
MAUREEN MCLEAN, J. LEWIS, D. JACOBSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN ARMANDO CHAPARRO
Torres v. Lambert et al
as 4:2018cv06894
Defendant:
R. Kelly, B. Lambert, J. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Matias Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberto Chaidez v. Susan Hubbard, et al
as 18-15885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTO CHAIDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN HUBBARD, Director, GEORGE GIURBINO, ROES, Mr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
