Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Woodard v. Reynolds Consumer Products LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00544
Plaintiff: Maurice Woodard
Defendant: Reynolds Consumer Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fm
In re: Maurice Woodard
as 17-2786
Petitioner: In re: MAURICE WOODARD
Defendant - Respondent: MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
WOODARD v. CLARK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00174
Petitioner: MAURICE WOODARD
Respondent: MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOODARD v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00258
Petitioner: MAURICE WOODARD
Respondent: SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carl Woodard v. United State
as 16-2882
Petitioner: Carl Maurice Woodard
Respondent: United States of America
Carl Woodard v. United State
as 12-3774
Petitioner - Appellant: Carl Maurice Woodard
Respondent - Appellee: United States of America
Woodard v. USA
as 0:2012cv01865
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Carl Maurice Woodard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Maurice Woodard v. Franklin Ten, et al
as 12-1919
Petitioner: In re: MAURICE WOODARD
Respondent: FRANKLIN TENNIS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Maurice Woodard v. Franklin Tennis, et al
as 09-3147
Plaintiff - Appellant: MAURICE WOODARD
Defendant - Appellee: FRANKLIN TENNIS, DA ERIE CTY and ATTY GEN PA
WOODARD v. TENNIS et al
as 1:2007cv00225
Petitioner: MAURICE WOODARD
Respondent: FRANKLIN TENNIS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?