Cases 1 - 8 of 8
People's United Equipment Finance Corp. v. Barnes et al
as 1:2011mc00011
Plaintiff:
People's United Equipment Finance Corp.
Defendant:
James Heath Barnes, James Henry Barnes , Jr., Aaron Ray Barnes and others
Northwest Administrators, Inc. v. Maverick Asphalt Inc
as 2:2011cv00606
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Maverick Asphalt Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust et al v. Maverick Asphalt, Inc.
as 2:2010cv05378
Defendant:
Maverick Asphalt, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust, Trustees of the Operating Engineers Training Trust and others
Financial Federal Credit Inc. v. Barnes et al
as 4:2010cv01789
Plaintiff:
Financial Federal Credit Inc.
Defendant:
James Heath Barnes, James Henry Barnes, Jr., Aaron Ray Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maverick Asphalt, Inc. v. Windsor Fuel Company et al
as 1:2010cv00569
Plaintiff:
Maverick Asphalt, Inc.
Defendant:
Windsor Fuel Company , Windsor Fuel Co., Inc. , Continental Western Transportation Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Maverick Asphalt, Inc. v. Windsor Fuel Company et al
as 2:2010at00400
Plaintiff:
Maverick Asphalt, Inc.
Defendant:
Windsor Fuel Company , Windsor Fuel Co., Inc. , Continental Western Transportation Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Maverick Asphalt Inc
as 2:2010cv00068
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Maverick Asphalt Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Maverick Asphalt Inc
as 2:2009cv00819
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Maverick Asphalt Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
