Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McNEIL V. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
as 1:2022cv02378
Plaintiff:
David McNeill
Respondent:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
Petitioner:
DAVID MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
PORTILLO et al v. SMITH COMMONS DC, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00049
Defendant:
KAMAL CHANAKA, RONALD F. MCNEILL, KAMAL KURUPPU and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ROMERO, EMILIANO DE JESUS PORTILLO, WILLIAM CASTANEDA TEJADA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ZHOU v. HERRING et al
as 1:2017cv02155
Plaintiff:
HUIXUAN ZHOU
Defendant:
MARK R. HERRING, SAM TOWELL, RHODES RITENOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOTOHAUS, LLC v. MCNEILL MEDIA GROUP, INC.
as 1:2017cv00744
Defendant:
MCNEILL MEDIA GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
FOTOHAUS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ZHOU v. HERRING et al
as 1:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
HUIXUAN ZHOU
Defendant:
MARK R. HERRING, RHODES RITENOUR, RITA DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammed Jawad v. Robert Gates, et al
as 15-5250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mohammed Jawad, also known as Saki Bacha
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert M. Gates, Former Secretary of Defense, Donald H. Rumsfeld, Former Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz, Former Deputy Secretary of Defense and others
LEWIS et al v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv01328
Plaintiff:
ROGER JOSEPH WILLIS, ELY CHEN, GEORGE J. BARR and others
Defendant:
ESTATE OF NICHOLAS L. AMABILE, ESTATE OF DANIEL H. COURTNEY, ESTATE OF LAWRENCE D. OLBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
JAWAD v. HAGEL et al
as 1:2014cv00811
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED JAWAD
Defendant:
CHUCK HAGEL, ROBERT M. GATES, DONALD H. RUMSFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
JENKO v. GATES et al
as 1:2010cv01702
Plaintiff:
ABDUL RAHIM ABDUL RAZAK AL JENKO
Defendant:
ROBERT M. GATES, DONALD RUMSFELD, PAUL WOLFOWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
