Cases 1 - 10 of 879
Means v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65316
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Means
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burton et al v. Bluefield Realty Group, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv01800
Plaintiff:
Shauntell Burton, Benny D. Cheatham, Robert Douglass and others
Defendant:
Bluefield Realty Group, LLC, Allen Tate Real Estate, LLC, McClendon Realty, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Woods v. City of St. Ann, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Michelle Woods
Defendant:
City of St. Ann, Missouri, Aaron Jimenez, Stefan Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Means v. Mulvane Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Christopher Means
Defendant:
Mulvane Police Department, Angie Collins, Thomas Torske and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5219
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5217
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PETZEL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al.
as 2:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
DEANE SUE PETZEL and DEANE SUE MEANS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN OF THE INDIANA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PETZEL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2024cv00384
Petitioner:
DEANE SUE PETZEL and DEANE SUE MEANS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
