Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kinard v. Crew
as 20-2803
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sylvia Gail Kinard
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Rudolph L. Crew, Medgar Evers College and City University of New York
Fletcher v. Medgar Evers College et al
as 1:2020cv04163
Defendant:
Felix V. Matos Rodrguez, City University of New York, Medgar Evers College and others
Plaintiff:
Sakia Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. City University of New York
as 20-628
Defendant / Appellee:
Victor Stevens, Public Safety & Campus Security of Medgar Evers College of CUNY in official capacity, Chancellor James Miliken, in his official capacity, City University of New York, (CUNY) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ras Omeil Novado Morgan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07424
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
