Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Pauneto-Tirado et al v. Medical Card Systems, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01591
Plaintiff:
Abner Pauneto-Tirado , Sonia Gonzalez and Conjugal Partnership Pauneto-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Medical Card Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Candelaria v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-1564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLANDO ORTEGA CANDELARIA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and MEDICAL CARD SYSTEMS, INC.
College of Dental Surgeons, et al v. Triple S Management, Inc., et al
as 12-1782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLLEGE OF DENTAL SURGEONS OF PUERTO RICO, on its own behalf and in representation of its members, THOMAS MANUEL MEDINA, NOEL AYMAT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TRIPLE S MANAGEMENT, INC., TRIPLE S, INC., TRIPLE C, INC. and others
Defendant:
ASOCIACION DE COMPANIAS DE SEGUROS DE PUERTO RICO, INC.
Ortega Candelaria v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 09-2305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLANDO ORTEGA CANDELARIA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and MEDICAL CARD SYSTEM, INC.
College of Dental Surgeons v. Triple S Management, Inc., et al
as 09-2201
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COLLEGE OF DENTAL SURGEONS OF PUERTO RICO, on its own behalf and in representation of its members
Defendant - Appellant:
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
A, B AND C INSURANCE COMPANIES, AMERICAN HEALTH, INC., ASOCIACION DE COMPANIAS DE SEGUROS DE PUERTO RICO, INC. and others
College of Dental Surgeons of Puerto Rico v. Triple S Management Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01209
Plaintiff:
College of Dental Surgeons of Puerto Rico
Defendant:
Triple S Management Inc., Triple S Inc, Triple C, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ortega Candelaria v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2008cv02382
Plaintiff:
Rolando Ortega Candelaria
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Medical Card System Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
