Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Thompson v. Coulter
as 23-4005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESLEY THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MEL COULTER
Marin v. Ross, et al
as 22-1239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY DALE ROSS, JR. and ROADRUNNER SCOOTERS LLC
Newton et al v. Hudson et al
as 5:2022cv03011
Plaintiff:
Andre Newton, Miguel Pizarro, Brian Pizarro and others
Defendant:
D. Hudson, Ol Aulepp, (fnu) Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Marin v. Ross et al
as 1:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mel Marin
Defendant:
Larry Dale Ross, Jr. and Roadrunner Scooters LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Garcia v. GEICO General Insurance Company et al
as 1:2021cv00756
Plaintiff:
Mel Eric Garcia
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company and Yet-To-Be-Identified Individuals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDaniel et al v. Dominium Management Services, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01997
Plaintiff:
Tonya McDaniel and Ashley McDaniel
Defendant:
Dominium Management Services, LLC and Mel Terrazas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bomprezzi v. Hartley
as 1:2021cv00382
Respondent:
Hartley
Petitioner:
Mel Bomprezzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mountain Pursuit v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2019cv00199
Defendant:
Bridger Teton National Forest Supervisor, Caribou Targhee National Forest Supervisor, United States Forest Service and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Pursuit
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Karst et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of KS et al
as 6:2019cv01031
Defendant:
Loretta Pfannenstiel, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Kansas, Lacey Farmer and others
Plaintiff:
Mel Karst and Estate of Kathleen K. Ukele
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bomprezzi v. Hagen et al
as 1:2017cv01998
Petitioner:
Mel Bomprezzi
Respondent:
Hagen and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
