Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Jerry Welty, Jr. v. Peter Meletis
as 19-7050
Defendant:
AMANDA LAMBERT, Director of Support Services, AUSTIN B. HAYNES, JR., Citizen at Large, PHILLIP CAMPBELL, Assistant fo the County Executive and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE HURLOCK, Director of Security, GLENDELL HILL, Chairman and PETER MELETIS, Superintendent
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY WELTY, JR.
Islam et al v. Melisa et al
as 1:2018cv02535
Defendant:
Michelle Sabio, New York City Transit Authority, Vice Chancellor Provost Panayiotis Meleties and others
Plaintiff:
Ashik Islam, MD and Aminul Islam, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lipscomb v. Hansen et al
as 1:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lipscomb
Defendant:
Mr. Hansen, R. Osborne, Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welty, Jr. v. Meletis et al
as 3:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
Jerry Welty, Jr.
Defendant:
Pete Meletis and Glendell Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welty v. Meletis et al
as 3:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jerry Welty, Jr.
Defendant:
Pete Meletis, Amanda Lambert, Roderick Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal
as 15-6905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH RUHREN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCOS SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police, LUTHER, Sergeant Manassas A.D.C. and MELETIS, Superintendent Manassas A.D.C.
Ruhren v. Spittal et al
as 1:2015cv00445
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Marcos Spittal, Luther and Meletis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Quincer v. Peter Meleti
as 13-7792
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER QUINCER
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER MELETIS, Superintendent
Christopher Quincer v. Pete Meleti
as 13-6239
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER QUINCER
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER MELETIS, Superintendent
Creed v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2012cv00317
Plaintiff:
John P. Creed
Defendant:
Glendell Hill , Charles Land , Peter A. Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
