Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Welty v. Meletis et al
as 3:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jerry Welty, Jr.
Defendant:
Pete Meletis, Amanda Lambert, Roderick Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal
as 15-6905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH RUHREN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCOS SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police, LUTHER, Sergeant Manassas A.D.C. and MELETIS, Superintendent Manassas A.D.C.
Ruhren v. Spittal et al
as 1:2015cv00445
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruhren
Defendant:
Marcos Spittal, Luther and Meletis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Quincer v. Peter Meleti
as 13-7792
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER QUINCER
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER MELETIS, Superintendent
Christopher Quincer v. Pete Meleti
as 13-6239
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER QUINCER
Respondent - Appellee:
PETER MELETIS, Superintendent
Creed v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2012cv00317
Plaintiff:
John P. Creed
Defendant:
Glendell Hill , Charles Land , Peter A. Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quincer v. Meletis
as 1:2011cv01140
Petitioner:
Christopher Andre S.W. Quincer
Respondent:
Pete Meletis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Suiter v. Prince William County Manassas Regional Adult Detention et al
as 3:2011cv00659
Petitioner:
Donald D. Suiter
Respondent:
Prince William County Manassas Regional Adult Detention and Peter Meletis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Suiter v. Meletis et al
as 3:2011cv00484
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Suiter
Defendant:
Peter Meletis and Prince William County Manassas Regional Adult Detention
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Stout v. Peter Meleti
as 10-7637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BENJAMIN STOUT
Defendant - Appellee:
MARITZA D. CORNEJO, Nurse, sued in her individual and offical capacity, PETER MELETIS, Superintendant, sued in his individual and offical capacity, DEBORAH A. KIBBLE, Head Nurse, sued in her individual and offical capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
