Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Clark v. Andrewjeski
as 3:2023cv06027
Petitioner:
Nicolas Aaron Clark
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowe v. Andrewjeski et al
as 3:2023cv05875
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peter Joseph Rowe
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2023cv05127
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Messner v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2023cv00245
Petitioner:
Anthony M Messner
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cummings v. Andrewjeski et al
as 2:2023cv01314
Petitioner:
Clayton Evan Cummings
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski, Bob Ferguson and John Joseph Samson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monson v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2023cv05118
Petitioner:
Donald Craig Monson
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2023cv01254
Petitioner:
Jess Richard Smith
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barton v. Andrewjeski et al
as 2:2023cv01176
Plaintiff:
Ronald Barton, Jr
Defendant:
Melissa Andrewjeski and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andritz v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2023cv05106
Petitioner:
Daniel Andritz
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Person v. Andrewjeski et al
as 3:2023cv05628
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shrone Person
Defendant:
Melissa Andrewjeski, Bob Ferguson and John Joseph Samson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
