Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Andritz v. Andrewjeski

as 4:2023cv05106
Petitioner:
Daniel Andritz
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Person v. Andrewjeski et al

as 3:2023cv05628
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shrone Person
Defendant:
Melissa Andrewjeski, Bob Ferguson and John Joseph Samson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Andrewjeski et al

as 3:2023cv05576
Petitioner:
Michael Kalami Lee
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scyphers v. Andrewjeski

as 2:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Douglas Dean Scyphers
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fletcher v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
William Fletcher
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Person v. Andrewjeski

as 3:2023cv05434
Petitioner:
Anthony Shrone Person
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collier v. Andrewjeski

as 2:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Collier, Jr
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Andrewjeski

as 3:2023cv05312
Petitioner:
Carlos M Ruiz
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collier v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2023cv05046
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Collier
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomasdinh Bowman v. Melissa Andrewjeski

as 23-35230
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMASDINH NEWSOME BOWMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
MELISSA ANDREWJESKI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.