Cases 51 - 60 of 86
Boswell v. Andrewjeski
as 3:2023cv05095
Petitioner:
Roy B Boswell
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryon Koeller v. Melissa Andrewjeski
as 23-35080
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRYON CHARLES KOELLER
Respondent / Appellee:
MELISSA ANDREWJESKI
Huber v. Washington State Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv05013
Plaintiff:
Bryce N Huber
Defendant:
Robert Jackson, Melissa Andrewjeski, Maryann Curl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Micheal Hudson, Jr. v. Melissa Andrewjeski
as 22-36063
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHEAL SAMUEL HUDSON, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
MELISSA ANDREWJESKI, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center
Lewandowski v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2022cv00321
Petitioner:
Joshua J Lewandowski
Respondent:
Andrew Jeski and Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nathan Nave v. Melissa Andrewjeski
as 22-35972
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN B. NAVE
Respondent / Appellee:
MELISSA ANDREWJESKI
Spears v. State of Washington
as 3:2022cv05898
Petitioner:
Marcus Isaiah Spears
Respondent:
State of Washington and Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mattice v. Andrewjeski
as 3:2022cv05782
Petitioner:
Christopher L Mattice
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2022cv00225
Defendant:
Jonathan Brooks Hawkins
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Neau et al
as 4:2022cv05120
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brooks Hawkins
Defendant:
Jonathan Neau, Timothy J Taylor, Kenneth G Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
