Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Danny Cohea v. C. Ducart, et al
as 20-15786
Defendant / Appellee:
K. J. ALLEN, Appeals Examiner, C. E. DUCART, D. BRADBURY, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY JAMES COHEA
Richemont International SA et al v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The
as 1:2018cv06555
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", sidforsenate.com, perfectkickz.site and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Cohea v. Ducart et al
as 3:2018cv03349
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
C. E. Ducart, S. Curtis, D. Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munoz-Gonzalez v. D.L.C. Limousine Service, Inc.
as 17-2438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alejandro Munoz-Gonzalez, on behalf of himself, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Danual Martin, Thomas Acheampong and others
Defendant - Appellee:
D.L.C. Limousine Service, Inc., Chris Thornton, individually, John D'Agostino, D'Agostino and others
Munoz-Gonzalez v. D.L.C. Limousine Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09368
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Munoz-Gonzalez , Danual Martin and Thomas Acheampong
Defendant:
D.L.C. Limousine Service, Inc., Chris Thornton, Melissa Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Caman et al v. D.L.C. Ground Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07448
Plaintiff:
Marie Caman
Defendant:
D.L.C. Ground Transportation Services, Inc., D.L.C. Limousine Services, Inc., D.L.C. Limo Service of Westchester, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Caman et al v. D.L.C. Ground Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv07448
Plaintiff:
Marie Caman
Defendant:
D.L.C. Ground Transportation Services, Inc., D.L.C. Limousine Services, Inc., D.L.C. Limo Service of Westchester, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
