Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ashlock v. Sanders et al
as 6:2010cv06089
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Ashlock
Defendant:
Larry Sanders, Melvin Steed, R Radley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Sanders, et al
as 6:2010cv06071
Plaintiff:
Ben Pitts
Defendant:
Larry Sanders, Melvin Steed, Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holly v. Mitchell et al
as 6:2009cv06118
Plaintiff:
Jessie L Holly
Defendant:
Michell Mitchell, R J Dunn, Melvin Steed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gautreaux v. Mitchell et al
as 6:2009cv06119
Plaintiff:
Gautreaux, Jr.
Defendant:
Michell Mitchell, R J Dunn, Melvin Steed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian v. Sanders et al
as 6:2009cv06111
Plaintiff:
Caleb M. Brian
Defendant:
Larry Sanders, Melvin Steed, Radley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks et al v. Mitchell et al
as 6:2009cv06085
Plaintiff:
Anthony Parks, Jessie L Holly and Robert H Gautraux, Jr
Defendant:
Michell Mitchell, R J Dunn, Melvin Steed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearcy v. Honeycutt et al
as 6:2009cv06082
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pearcy
Defendant:
Wayne Honeycutt, Melvin Steed and Ron Rodley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks et al v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2009cv00727
Plaintiff:
Anthony Parks, Jessie L Holly and Robert H Gautraux, Jr
Defendant:
Michell Mitchell, R J Dunn, Melvin Steed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearcy v. Honeycutt et al
as 4:2009cv00726
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pearcy
Defendant:
Wayne Honeycutt, Melvin Steed and Ron Rodley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond Thompson v. Captain Melvin Steed
as 09-2733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Damond Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
Captain Melvin Steed
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
