Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Thomas v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv03379
Plaintiff:
Melvin Thomas
Defendant:
Baltimore Police Department, George Vigue, Scott Danielczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Morris v. Placement Officer et al
as 1:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
Robert E Morris
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Placement Officer, John/Jane Doe Sanitation Officer, Keenan Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 4:2021cv01670
Plaintiff:
Melvin Thomas
Defendant:
Prince West, United States of America and United Postal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Logg et al v. TIG Insurance Company et al
as 3:2021cv05280
Plaintiff:
Robin Egnatios, Steven Rogers, Ric Logg and others
Defendant:
Contractors Bonding & Insurance Co., Atlantic Casualty Insurance Co., United Speciality Speciality Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Southern Mail Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Southern Mail Service, Inc. and David D. Fanning
Plaintiff:
Melvin Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Klein v. Day et al
as 2:2019cv00692
Defendant:
Independent Financial Services and Melvin Thomas Day, II
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Vanacor v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04743
Plaintiff:
Melvin Thomas Vanacor, III
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Thomas et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv29256
Plaintiff:
Diane Thomas and Melvin Thomas
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as PAE/2:14-cv-06555
Plaintiff:
DIANE THOMAS and MELVIN THOMAS
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
