Cases 1 - 10 of 107
LAZAR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LAZAR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN MCDERMOTT, DAVID BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Unknown Party
as 4:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
Melvin Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
RASHAD M. WILLIAMS and MELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE, LAUREL R. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Brutinel et al
as 4:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Melvin Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Brutinel and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Williams v. Hill et al
as 2:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Melvin Williams
Defendant:
Rick M. Hill and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Williams v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv00763
Plaintiff:
Melvin Williams
Defendant:
Rick M. Hill and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lule v. Williams
as 3:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
Jesus Lule
Defendant:
Melvin Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC)Williams v. Soto et al
as 1:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Melvin Williams
Defendant:
Soto, J. Lutz, A. Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv16998
Plaintiff:
Melvin Williams and Dorothy Williams
Defendant:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv14491
Plaintiff:
Melvin Williams
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
