Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordova v. Mendocino County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2177
Plaintiff:
GARY CORDOVA
Defendant:
MENDOCINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, COUNTY OF MENDOCINO and TIMOTHY DEL FIORENTINO
(PC) Davenport v. State of California's State and Communities Correction Board et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Jesse Davenport
Defendant:
State of California's State and Communities Correction Board and Mendocino County Corrections Facilities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Mendocino County Superior Court
as 4:2024cv01569
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Mendocino County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinzon v. Mendocino County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 23-4393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRAHAM G. PINZON
Defendant / Appellee:
MENDOCINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyer v. Warden of Mendocino County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv05762
Plaintiff:
Jewel Evern Dyer
Defendant:
Warden of Mendocino County Jail, Mendocino County Jail, Owner/Boss of Naph-Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
